Observation: Samsung
顯示具有 Samsung 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Samsung 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2014/11/29

iPhone 6+最便宜一支兩萬五,ZenFone為何只能賣六千



這是一題今年政大科管面試的題目,在PTT graduate版上看到一位強者(政大科管正取一)分享了面試經驗,其中每一題的問題我覺得都非常值得慢慢思考,仔細品嘗。

iPhone 6+最便宜一支兩萬五,ZenFone為何只能賣六千?

這只是其中一題。一開始的想法是,高科技行銷管理朱克聰老師所畫的地租供需模型,市場價格是由需求來決定的! 需求的人越多,供給垂直線,數量一定,需求曲線一直上移,價格就越高。但是其實iPhone供給(出貨)其實超級多啊,好像不算是這樣有稀少性的產品。(但它的品牌確實是只有它有)

另一個想法,嗯,對我們都知道他品牌價值超高,Interbrand 2014又給了Apple品牌價值第一名,所以他就可以賣這麼貴然後全世界搶著買?好像也不太有說服力。

這時我又想到朱老師的另一個常強調的觀點,市場競爭。

換個角度想,也可以說,ZenFone本來就不是要跟iPhone 6+對打的產品阿,定位不同,他之所以要賣到六千,不就是因為學小米做低價手機...學小米!?因為他們要在低價市場競爭!是因為這些廠商的競爭,所以消費者才有幸能夠享受更有效率的市場,也就是可以買到功能很好但便宜非常多又實用的手機,都是托小米,喔不是,是市場競爭的福。

可是蘋果呢?


陳炫碩老師上學期的電子商務中提到一篇文章,在談Apple其實一直在做的事情,就是,活在自己的世界裡,不跟其他人競爭。我沒有要跟你比的意思啦! 我不屑。

這是什麼意思?Apple 自己建立一個自己的王國(裡面當然住的就是果粉),建立自己的遊戲規則,把其他我們以為是他競爭者的對手,變得與自己毫不相干,好像是兩個完全不同市場的產品一樣,不同市場的產品怎麼會有競爭呢?沒有競爭,你要把iPhone 6跟誰比呢? 跟小米? 三星? HTC? iPhone表示,No,我從來沒有要跟他們比較的意思,他們與我無關。

這其實也就是從0到1作者,PayPal 共同創辦人Peter Thiel 所說的,企業應追求自己市場上的壟斷,而非一直和對手競爭,Apple就是壟斷了他獨有的市場區隔,在這個圈圈裡,根本沒有對手,沒有對手就沒有競爭,消費者在真的很想要敗Apple的情況下彈性很小,沒有議價能力,壟斷者當然就是自己定自己的價,但消費者最還是買的甘之如飴。

當然,這並非一種法律上或是自然資源的壟斷,這壟斷是來自於其產品軟硬體本身的極致設計所帶來的效果,然後建立起了強大的忠誠度,也就是堅強的果粉們。

最後還有一點,我想這是安卓陣營的宿命,就是沒有自己的OS,所有人都只是Google和iOS對抗的一子棋。在未來,能夠建立物聯網平台的人,連起你的家電、車子、房子、孩子,大概不會是HTC,朱老師表示就是他們很缺乏的,沒有平台上的布局,很會做手機,但是手機賣完,就沒了。物聯網平台兩大龍頭會是誰,當然就Google跟Apple,當然三星也是很有機會。但是其他安卓廠,大概除了小米比較聰明有建立起自己的生態和米粉外,其他在未來策略佈局上,目前看起來實在很難跟Google 或Apple競爭。

image source

2013/09/19

台灣,科技界的半導體巨人 陷入困境? (譯自The New York Times)

台灣,科技界的半導體巨人 陷入困境?
Taiwan Chip Industry Powers the Tech World, but Struggles for Status

原文 By ERIC PFANNER Published: September 15, 2013
翻譯 Kevin Chang

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Tien Wu, chief operating officer of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, has a problem: the brightest young people in Taiwan do not want to work in the island’s signature business, chip making.

日月光半導體營運長吳田玉表示,台灣現在碰到一個狀況,國內正發光發熱的年輕人並不願意進入在台灣相當具代表性的半導體產業工作。

“All the college freshmen are asking, ‘Why should I join the industry? I’d rather work for Facebook, Apple or Google,’ ” Mr. Wu said in an interview.

吳田玉在訪問中提到:「所有的社會新鮮人都說:為何我要進入半導體產業?我比較想去Facebook、Apple,或是Google上班。」

Taiwan, an island of 23 million people, is the world’s biggest chip maker. The industry generated about $63 billion in sales here last year — more than one-fifth of the global total, according to the Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association. Made-in-Taiwan chips are major components in many of the world’s PCs, smartphones, cameras and other gadgets.

台灣,這座有兩千三百萬的人口的島嶼,同時也是世界規模最大晶片製造國。根據台灣半導體產業協會,光是半導體產業在去年就有630億的產值,超過全世界的五分之一。台灣製造的晶圓是所有電腦、智慧型手機、數位相機,和其他科技產品中最主要的零件。

Why, then, has chip making lost its allure? Many semiconductor companies in Taiwan struggle with low profit margins or even lose money. At the same time, Silicon Valley giants like Google and Apple, whose wizardry would be impossible without the continuing innovations of the semiconductor industry, are sitting on so much cash they do not know what to do with it.

那是為什麼製造晶圓不再擁有吸引力呢?許多台灣的半導體公司正面臨低落的毛利,或甚至虧損的狀況。然而,要是沒有半導體產業持續的研發創新,這些矽谷巨人如Google 和 Apple,他們有再好的產品也毫無用武之地,他們只會剩下為數可觀的資金卻不知道要往哪裡花。

“We’re the guys in the hot room, forging the iron and taking the heat, and someone else is reaping the benefit,” Mr. Wu said.

「我們就是那群在熔爐裡,忍受著高溫,鑄造產品,然後讓其他人坐享其成的人。」吳田玉說。

His lament was echoed by executives of other companies during a semiconductor trade show in Taiwan last week. So even as engineers toil at the latest technological breakthroughs in chip design and manufacturing, industry leaders are also wrestling with a bigger question: how can the semiconductor business grab a bigger portion of the profits it enables?

在台灣上星期舉辦的半導體貿易展覽會中,其他企業經理也有著和吳田玉相同的困擾。就連工程師,也總是費盡心力,為了在製造和設計上得到突破,企業主也不斷絞盡腦汁思考一個更大的問題:到底該怎麼做才能讓半導體產業得到更好的利潤?

The issue is gaining urgency because one of the axioms of semiconductors may be about to break down, putting new financial pressure on the industry. According to Moore’s Law, named after Gordon E. Moore, co-founder of Intel, the number of transistors on a chip doubles every two years. But transistors are now packed so densely on chips that it may be technically impossible to go further without corrupting data, specialists say.

有人認為摩爾定律即將被打破,因此也讓這個問題顯得日益重要。摩爾定律,以Intel的共同創辦人戈登摩爾命名。摩爾定律指出積體電路上可容納的電晶體數目,約每隔24個月便會增加一倍。但現在晶片上電晶體密集的程度,可能已快要達到技術瓶頸,研究人員說。

“Everybody is coming up against this,” said Pascal Viaud, chief strategy officer of Yole Développement, a consulting firm in Lyon, France. “The industry is going to need to find new ways of creating value.”

「所有人現在都碰到了這個問題,」在法國里昂的Yole Développement,策略長Pascal Viaud表示,「這個產業需要找到新方式來創造價值。」

One approach is to stack transistors, creating so-called three-dimensional chips, rather than line them up side by side. Samsung Electronics of South Korea announced this summer what it described as the first mass-produced 3-D chips for flash memory, a major component in smartphones.

其中一種方法是所謂的3D晶片,比起並排電晶體,3D晶片能夠塞入更多的電晶體。南韓三星電子在今年夏季發表了這項技術,作為快閃記憶體,且大量生產的3D晶片,同時也是智慧型手機中重要的零件。

Although 3-D technology and other advances promise to lower the cost and increase the performance of consumer electronics, they make chip design and manufacturing more complicated and expensive. This has prompted semiconductor companies to rethink how the industry is structured.

雖然3D技術或是其他創新技術能夠使成本降低並提高消費性電子產品的效能,這卻讓晶片的設計和製造變得更加複雜且昂貴。這使半導體公司開始重新思考產業結構的問題。

Several business models are competing for primacy

許多不同的商業模式正在競爭龍頭寶座。

The giants of the industry, including Samsung and Intel, offer one-stop shopping — designing, manufacturing and packaging chips into integrated circuits that are sold to the companies that design and assemble finished phones, cameras and other products. Advocates of this approach, featuring chip-making behemoths known as integrated device manufacturers, or I.D.M.’s, say it provides the financial scale and technological expertise to deal with the industry’s challenges.

半導體產業巨擘,包括三星,Intel,延攬所有購買,設計,製造,封裝,再交給組裝廠完成組裝,組裝成手機,相機,或是其他產品。這些企業利用這種一條龍的商業模式,垂直整合生產,企業擁有足夠的經濟規模,也有技術專家持續研發。

Another approach is more specialized, with separate companies handling different stages in the creation of an integrated circuit. Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, for example, packages and tests chips that have been made by so-called chip foundries and designed by others. Supporters of this approach say clients of electronics companies prefer to deal with more focused semiconductor contractors.

而另一種方法則是較屬於專業分工,由不同的公司分別完成生產的各個階段。舉例來說,聯電負責封裝並測試晶圓代工廠做好的晶片。支持專業分工的人認為,這些電子公司客戶比較喜歡和較專精的半導體承包商合作。

“Today, I can say with certainty that the I.D.M. model is dead,” said Ajit Manocha, chief executive of Global Foundries, a chip maker in Milpitas, Calif., that was created from the manufacturing arm of Advanced Micro Devices four years ago.

「今天,我可以肯定地說垂直整合模式已經死了,」位於加州的半導體公司,格羅方德(Global Foundries) 的執行長Ajit Manocha如此說。格羅方德是四年前從AMD分拆的半導體公司。

Although semiconductor companies everywhere are wrestling with how they should be structured, it is particularly pertinent in Taiwan because of the industry’s size and its relative fragmentation. Taiwan has been less affected by the rounds of consolidation that have concentrated the industry in a handful of big players elsewhere.

全球的半導體公司都在思索著如何改善企業架構,台灣也不例外。台灣的半導體產業分散,但是台灣卻在強敵環伺的情況下,能夠較不被那些垂直整合的巨型企業衝擊。

To try to cope with the new challenges, the biggest chip maker on the island, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or T.S.M.C., long considered purely a foundry, has recently moved to add capabilities, like chip packaging.

為了面對新的挑戰,台灣規模最大的半導體公司台積電,過去試著保持一個純代工廠的身分,最近已經開始嘗試積體電路的封裝。

United Microelectronics Corporation, the second-largest foundry by revenue in Taiwan, has announced an alliance with International Business Machines to develop new technology, as well as investments in other chip companies.

營收規模第二大的代工廠聯電,宣布和IBM結盟,聯合開發新技術,也同時投資其他晶圓廠。

Despite all the maneuvering, 2013 is shaping up as a pretty good year for chip makers in Taiwan, with total revenue expected to rise to 1.87 trillion Taiwan dollars, or about $63 billion, up 14 percent from 2012, according to the Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association. But the industry is volatile; two years ago, sales plunged 12 percent.

儘管有許多的改變,2013正發展為有利於台灣半導體公司的一年。根據台灣半導體產業協會的資料,2013年總營收預計可高達1.87兆新台幣,約630億美金,比2012年成長了14%。然而這個產業動盪起伏不定,兩年前銷售曾經驟降達12%。

Some analysts see signs of a turnaround in memory chips, one of the weakest parts of the industry. Prices have been weak for years because chip makers expanded capacity just as sales of personal computers, a big user of memory chips, began to slump. But consolidation has helped put capacity back in line with sales.

分析師看到了記憶體晶片的震盪,記憶體是台灣半導體產業最弱的一環,價格持續低迷了幾年,因為製造廠只擴充了大量使用記憶體晶片的個人電腦產線,但卻銷售卻不斷下滑,然而企業間的聯合使得銷售量回升。

The vulnerability of the market to changes in supply and demand was demonstrated in early September when a fire at a plant in China that is owned by SK Hynix of South Korea, the second-biggest producer of dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, chips after Samsung, caused prices in the spot market to surge as much as 20 percent.

九月SK Hynix在中國的工廠大火充分顯示了半導體市場供需的敏感。Hynix是僅次於三星,生產DRAM第二大的企業,這場大火使得市場價格爆增了20%。

The market for other chips, including those that serve as the brains of computers and mobile devices, has been steadier, helped by the global boom in sales of smartphones and other mobile devices.

相反的,由於智慧型裝置的大量出貨,CPU晶片市場卻是相對穩定的。

Some executives say concerns about the structure of the industry are overblown. Instead of coveting the lavish profits of the Internet companies and mobile phone makers like Apple and Samsung, they say, chip makers ought to work on developing new markets for their products in industries like automobiles and health care.

有些主管認為半導體產業已經過度膨脹,與其打著網路公司和手機廠像是Apple和三星的主意,晶圓廠亟虛開發新的市場,比如說汽車產業和健康醫療產業。

“It’s about innovation,” said Jack Sun, chief technology officer of T.S.M.C. “We need to collaborate to create innovation together. Otherwise we won’t be able to retire.”

「關鍵在於創新,」孫元成,台積電的技術長說,「我們需要彼此合作創新,否則我們不能安心退休。」

“So leave the software guys and the O.E.M.’s alone for now,” he said, referring to the companies that assemble electronics devices, known as original equipment manufacturers.

「所以從現在開始讓那些軟體工程師和OEM廠好好相處吧!」他說。


原文: